|
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 121)
|
|
 |
Wasn't the best movie I saw, this type of story was seen before. But if they had put a little more action, it would be a much better movie. Too much talking in this one.
4/10
5.3.2010 -
danhockey24@ - age: 13-17
I think it was a great movie. Good storyline and great acting. Yes, maybe a little bit "old school" (this is why we liked it) If you need constant shooting, car chasing, exploding, then don't watch it.
8/10
1.3.2010 -
pantal@ - age: 26-35
Been there, done that. The storyline was the same thing we have seen before - expected more.
6/10
27.2.2010 -
henderchickens@ - age: 36-49
This movie was very good... is about a conspiracy... it is scary to see what politicians do to keep power and companies to make $... a must see!
8/10
25.2.2010 -
blackpanther,d@ - age: 26-35
Good movie, well worth seeing. Won't get the respect it deserves with all of the Mel Haters out there.
8/10
22.2.2010 -
mangydonkey@ - age: 36-49
I think it's a great movie to go watch in the theatre. Good clean action killing.
8/10
22.2.2010 -
mk_kleiner@ - age: 26-35
Good performance by Mel Gibson; interesting plot; can't snooze in this one!
8/10
21.2.2010 -
lf,smith@ - age: 50+
It was a good movie, worth seeing.
7/10
20.2.2010 -
roy,mitton@ - age: 36-49
Excellent movie! Mel Gibson's performance was spot on as the character he portrayed. Keep up the great work Mel!
9/10
18.2.2010 -
eeojj@ - age: 36-49
It is a good movie, a little bit too violent for me. It is been a while since we saw Mel Gibson in a movie.
7/10
18.2.2010 -
mariette,robichaud@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
Movie started well but was a little slow, boring most of the time, good actors, OK acting, but not much more. What's with Mel's Boston accent sometimes he spoke like he inhaled helium, very strange. I was really hoping to see Mel's character as he was in the lethal weapon series.
6/10
17.2.2010 -
tony,colacci@ - age: 50+
Worst movie I have ever seen this year. The acting was really bad and the story was all over the place and the "jokes" weren't really needed in a "serious" movie. Not even worth renting.
1/10
16.2.2010 -
ruined_sins666@ - age: 18-25
Good comeback by Mel, ok story, but the movie was a bit to slow for me. A good rental.
6/10
15.2.2010 -
bigj50@ - age: 26-35
I can honestly say that I have never been more disappointed in my life! Horrible story, and even worse acting! Mel was terrible with that stupid bastan accent! Geez! Do not see this movie!!!
1/10
15.2.2010 -
jay_bird1234@ - age: 26-35
Whoever is calling this an action movie is wrong; it is a mystery thriller. And not a terribly thrilling or mysterious one either. The plot is unoriginal and lacking in surprises. Sure, there is the odd shocker moment (and they really are pretty shocking), but there's nothing that really stands out about this, with the exception of Mel's freakout moments. It's a whole lot of fun watching him mess up some jerk who gets on his nerves or in his way. And for that and that alone it gets a 7.
7/10
14.2.2010 -
newscott13@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
It was good. I wasn't sure what to expect but I was impressed! There were a few twists which made it better too.
7/10
14.2.2010 -
amanda_leliever@ - age: 26-35
I thought I was good? Couple really surprising parts and the ending wasn't disappointing at all, deff thought it was worth seeing in theatres.
9/10
14.2.2010 -
nicolej1993@ - age: 13-17
A good performance by Mel Gibson, but the plot lacked depth and originality... and especially the rage of lets say a movie like Taken. Over all I found it to move way too slow and it couldn't decide weather it was going to be and action, thriller or drama. It fell short on all 3. Still worth seeing, but I'd rent it.
6/10
14.2.2010 -
saskheat@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
This movie was amazing, if anyone asked me to see it with them I would go again, the only part I didn't get was the very end when the dad walks away with his daughter, did he die.. ?
10/10
13.2.2010 -
ilijamirkovic11@ - age: 13-17
I did not like this movie at all. However, to be fair, my friends and I went into this movie not knowing anything about its plot, and it seemed like every 5 minutes, a part of someones body was blown out. That was the only thing that kept me interested. I found it hard to follow, irrelevant, and pretty disturbing. However, maybe if it's your type of movie, it will spark your interest.
1/10
13.2.2010 -
kool-kitty123@ - age: 13-17
Worth seeing. If you miss it in the theaters, then buy it or rent it. It's not just a good story, it's thought provoking. Deals with moral dilemmas and has a few jump out of your seat moments as well.
7/10
13.2.2010 -
btorlot@ - age: 36-49
Wasn't expecting anything from it. Just went gnaaa! Alright... Anyway, even if I believe Mel is getting too old for that kind of action movie, it was alright. I would have give it a 6.5 but no can do with the scale provided. But you might want to wait for the DVD.
6/10
13.2.2010 -
bechardluc@ - age: 36-49
Buy the series on DVD - better use of your money. Unfortunately, the movie was only a pale immitation of the orginal. The Jedburgh character was a complete mystery to me. In the series - he was one of the highlights.
6/10
12.2.2010 -
lawrieh@ - age: 36-49
Amazing, given the number of high ratings, that the average reflects in the mediocre range. Perhaps the criticisms that the movie is slow and that there is too much dialogue says more about the capacities of those criticizing it than it does about the film.
7/10
12.2.2010 -
patac49@ - age: 36-49
Martin Campbell gave this film a superb direction. The evidence is clear Mel Gibson gave an awesome performance. $$$
9/10
12.2.2010 -
lb10jc82@ - age: 26-35
I was hooked during the first 5 minutes; that's the beauty of movie making, and literal art. Don't give me political garbage and religious satire; this was pure Mel Gibson style. Lived up to its name.
10/10
12.2.2010 -
myalsharaf786@ - age: 26-35
Fantastic film... it's great to see Mel Gibson returning to starring roles!
10/10
12.2.2010 -
jgmclean@ - age: 18-25
Very well done, Mel's best movie.
9/10
11.2.2010 -
areyouserious@ - age: 36-49
Another Mel Gibson great performance. This is a good movie!
8/10
11.2.2010 -
threadfast@ - age: 36-49
Mel Gibson is wrapped up in this character - only a seasoned actor can pull this off. This movie has suspense, action, drama, and espionage all mixed with bad politics. This movie is worth seeing...
8/10
11.2.2010 -
dbnicholson@ - age: 26-35
Really loved it, I thought it was well worth the $4.95... I think Mel does an excellent performance. You really get into his soul when he looses his daughter and there are moments when you feel his loss so much like at the end. It is very heartbreaking, I do not know if it would be wise to watch this if you have lost someone... Very sad...
8/10
9.2.2010 -
gem_vfr750@ - age: 36-49
I didn't care for the last bit and ending of the movie... it was like it was rushed through and then... nothing!
6/10
9.2.2010 -
jodesehov11@ - age: 36-49
It's an authentic thriller. Clean cut action. Great truth behind it. It left me on the edge of my seat at moments... I love that! The killing was exactly what you would expect in an action/thriller movie ' wam bam thank you ' straight to the point. I havent enjoyed a movie like this in a long time!!! Pls go See!
9/10
9.2.2010 -
make-upbymk@ - age: 18-25
I am a big fan of Mel Gibson so I had to see his acting return after an 8 year absence. I was disappointed. The story is a police procedural better suited for television than the big screen; Gibson is just an ordinary cop in a small city with most of the film just talking. I was expecting something on a grander scale -like "Taken"- international locations with a highly trained covert operative. Apparently, Gibson is set next to direct a Viking movie spoken in the Norse language- it should be better than "Edge of Darkness".
3/10
8.2.2010 -
chester1958@ - age: 50+
| | | | |
Very good movie. Contains one of the most brutal and effective kills I've seen in a movie in a long time. A lot of action and murdering. Almost as good as Mel Gibson's Payback.
8/10
8.2.2010 -
troykmusic@ - age: 18-25
This movie is excellent! Action, suspense, horror and thriller all rolled into one. A couple of scenes were shocking and disturbing that left me frozen in your seat wondering what the hell just happened. At some points I had tears in my eyes, the story really hits home on losing a family member. On a very positive note, Gibson is back baby, his acting was awesome. This is a must see movie!
9/10
8.2.2010 -
cavenerashley@ - age: 26-35
Has some disturbing parts but it's a good movie.
9/10
7.2.2010 -
cjb@ - age: 18-25
Loved the action and the character Mel is so real.
10/10
7.2.2010 -
georgiag7@ - age: 36-49
Quick paced, but a lot of details one could miss out on during a bathroom break.
7/10
7.2.2010 -
nataliina@ - age: 18-25
This is one of the few times that the collective rating of the average viewer has disagreed with mine. This movie didn't have a few loose ends; it didn't have plot holes; it had plot craters: there were so many things that were neither explained properly nor thought through. Oh, the acting was good. But the plot? How does a half-gased man so easily escape from an allegedly well guarded compound? Why go through the trouble of publicly killing a worker you're already slowly poisoning? What does it matter if a nuclear weapon is made with foreign parts? Missiles can traced using their trajectory. And if its simply for dirty bombs for the purpose of sale, why would the United States government be implicit in it after 9/11? Etc. etc etc. I personally think it's a movie that insults the viewers' intelligence.
6/10
7.2.2010 -
kancy@ - age: 26-35
Good to see Mel Gibson back , but I must say although it markted as the movie "Taken " , it's not ,
6/10
7.2.2010 -
george_300m@ - age: 36-49
An enjoyable movie. Good plot. Mel is good in it. Would have nice to see more of Ray. He is a very good actor.
8/10
7.2.2010 -
mattcalgary@ - age: 26-35
It was a good movie worth seeing... u really have to watch to follow the story line...
7/10
6.2.2010 -
lorbos@ - age: 36-49
Predictable and unjustified storyline. Good Mel Gibson's acting.
6/10
6.2.2010 -
canary28185@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
This movie was boring. Way too many scenes of people sitting around talking. Talking at the dinner table, couches, benches, cars.
2/10
5.2.2010 -
ray131@ - age: 26-35
Despite some melodrama and a few plot holes, Mel Gibson puts in a very sincere performance that completely sells the story in this movie. It may not be for everybody, but it really worked for me.
8/10
5.2.2010 -
dtander@ - age: 50+
| | | | |
Good acting by Mel, but story was weak and anticlimatic.
6/10
5.2.2010 -
cbwebb@ - age: 36-49
This is a return to form for Mel. It's a quality production. It's a well-told paranoid conspiracy thriller involving the highest levels of government, slick ruthless assassins, corrupt senators implictated with a sinister nuclear facility. This film has Mels Christian beliefs shown in an old testament revenge formula style of filmmaking. The film isn't as twisted and nutty as the great paranoid spy thrillers of the 70's such as THREE DAYS OF THE CONDOR, THE PARALLAX VIEW, THE CONVERSATION, WINTER KILLS and the one truly nutty paranoid thriller in Brian De Palma's BLOW OUT. Mels film even has strong similarities to De Palma's SNAKE EYES. EOD nevertheless has strong elements that keep you watching to the end.
7/10
5.2.2010 -
harry,georgatos@ - age: 36-49
Very very very very boring. Just dont watch this garbage.
2/10
5.2.2010 -
skhgah@ - age: 18-25
Edge of Darkness has a very good story. The acting was brilliant by the whole cast. Go see it, I'm sure you will enjoy it.
9/10
5.2.2010 -
bjannati@ - age: 26-35
| 
