Log in / Sign up
 
    Share this page

    Django Unchained

    Advertisement

    Reviewed by
    kaptain.kanada@

    Tarantino starts off by showing his complete ignorance of the historical period in which his flick allegedly takes place by saying that the year, 1858, is "Two years before the American Civil War". The War Between the States didn't start until 1861 so Tarantino either flunked math class, history class, or both. The music which is injected periodically for no apparent reason has little or nothing to do with the story and mostly distracts from it; it's usually way too loud, also. The dialogue is frequently in 21st century Californian dialect rather than 19th century southern American. The morbid humour trails off and is dropped about a third of the way into the movie. The bloodbath scenes even manage to distract from the violence, as the audience marvels at the special effects needed to make the blood fly. The only thing that saved this too-long movie from utter disaster was the acting, in which several of the actors triumphed over the idiotic script. Tarantino, like the Coen brothers, had his day and is now just another washed-up, conceited Hollywood hack.

    5
    HelpfulNot helpful  Reply
    kaptain.kanada@  26.12.2012 age: 50+ 136 reviews

    Full goofies (anachronisms) in this movie just look at imdb ;-)

    HelpfulNot helpful Reply
    flobinard@  28.12.2012 age: 36-49

    "Washed-up conceited Hollywood hack" -- right on! Good review, my feelings exactly. I'm appalled at all the 10/10 fanboy reviews, such knee-jerk approval just encourages more of the same from this guy.

    HelpfulNot helpful Reply
    dodge@  14.1.2013 age: 50+ 26 reviews

    Show all reviews for this movie
    Note: The texts posted on this page reflect personal opinions of our users. We are not responsible for their content.

    Did you see ''Django Unchained''?

    There is a problem with your e-mail address and we are unable to communicate with you. Please go to My Account to update your email.

    How do you rate this movie?

    Select stars from 1 to 10.
    10 - A masterpiece, go, see it now
    9 - Excellent movie, a must see
    8 - Great movie, don't miss it
    7 - Good movie, worth seeing
    6 - Not bad, could be much better
    5 - So so, okay if you don't pay
    4 - Not good, even if you don't pay
    3 - Poor movie, not recommended
    2 - Very bad, forget about it
    1 - Worst ever, avoid at all costs

    Please explain. Write your comment here:

    Please choose a username to sign your comments. Only letters, digits, dash - or period. Minimum 4 characters.

    Your age and sex:

    We publish all comments, except abusive, at our discretion.