80 user reviews
6.5
/10
| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
- 0 |
- 0 |
8 1 |
6.7 3 |
5.5 13 |
5.6 20 |
5.7 37 |
| Women: Votes: |
- 0 |
8 1 |
8 4 |
8 7 |
5.9 9 |
7.4 16 |
7.3 38 |
| Total: Votes: |
- 0 |
8 1 |
7.8 6 |
7.6 10 |
5.7 24 |
6.4 37 |
6.5 80 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
Reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 80)
Sadly, it's a fail. Predictable, boring, overacting... Normaly love Woody's work but not this time.
| 3/10 | dudemtl@ - 2 reviews 20.4.2013 - age: 36-49 |
This was indeed entertaining. A nice/sweet/somewhat crazylike in a good funny way. Enjoyable to sum it up.
| 7/10 | shazjoao@ - 1728 reviews 18.2.2013 |
I never was a Woody Allen fan but watching Midnight and Paris and this one made me think I should go back and watch some more Woody Allen films. I enjoyed this.
| 8/10 | jfmontreal@ - 94 reviews 31.1.2013 - age: 36-49 |
I emailed a friend who happens to be a film critic and asked his opinion. It's HORRIBLE!!! Give this one a big miss... it's dreadful! Wish I had contacted him before spending the money...
| 2/10 | shawna.gnutel@ - first review 22.1.2013 - age: 36-49 |
Highly underrated movie. Yes, sure for people who are used to Woody Allen's usual more subtle message it might be a bit missing but it brings an interesting point of view on media and it's sure to bring out a few laughs out of you. Also it's reminiscent of Bananas' absurdity so you can't say it's not a Woody movie. Finally there's also Ellen Page doing what she does best, playing with men's emotion. My friend and I greatly appreciated it.
| 8/10 | redalpha@ - first review 6.11.2012 - age: 18-25 |
I thought it was frivolous and did not make sense, but... it was very amusing and I laughed quite a bit... very good Woody Allan movie... good practice for people taking italian lessons.. I think it's very worth seeing... I thought good acting... and maybe the opera singer should consider a change of career... great voice...
| 8/10 | anne@ - 5 reviews 5.11.2012 - age: 50+ |
An OK film... some vignettes better than others. Not a great film... perhaps better watching it on Netflix or when it comes out on video.
| 6/10 | bev_drolet@ - 12 reviews 31.10.2012 - age: 50+ |
Woody Allen's latest work is mind blowing. The acting, although a bit 'theatre-like', is incredible. Each and every character went through a redeeming point which brings you a wonderful lesson. The humour was pretty good, but not everyone will understand it or consider it as funny. To some, this movie may seem too long and I agree with them completely, but this is due to the large number of characters and the plots that overlap one another. I recommend this to anyone who has an artsy mind and an open heart to watch this; this may only suit a small number of audience.
| 8/10 | michele@ - 5 reviews 8.10.2012 - age: 13-17 |
Very long winded. Disapointing given the crew casting. If someone tells you it's very clever, then they are not. Save your cash for a better film.
| 2/10 | michelsmari@ - first review 6.10.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Woody Allen's latest is TERRIBLE. His hackneyed movies about white people used to have epiphanies and the characters grew- LONG LONG AGO. Paris was weak and shallow but brilliant in its construction. The acting in this is so wooden by all but the true Europeans, the self-discoveries so shallow, the premise so weak that it was difficult to watch. Even Rome is not shown in its best light. And anyone who used to think Woody being Woody was funny is NOW DEAD. That was 40 years ago, Woody. They're DEAD.
| 2/10 | dannimac@ - 67 reviews 13.9.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Great spoof on the vacuity of celebrity and reality TV and at same time a slice of real life with a great dose of tongue in cheek humour and splash of superficiality of contemporary sexual relationships. I laughed more than any movie I've seen this year, or last.
| 9/10 | donna@ - first review 8.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
A good movie, very Woody Allen. It's interesting, funny and entertaining. Good cast. I think it's one of those movies that is not very serious, makes you forget your problems and have a good laugh.
| 7/10 | greco64@ - 402 reviews 3.9.2012 - age: 36-49 |
I get the feeling that Woody let actors improvise some of the scenes, and most of the jokes were tired one-liners that failed to get the desired response. Sadly, I paid dearly.
| 5/10 | gilhayward@ - first review 3.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
A seemingly disconnected film that manages somehow to convey the importance of Rome as a backdrop. Woody Allen manages to cover the English and Italian stories quite well, while illustrating absurdity and craziness that crosses language boundaries. The only problem is that Allen casts himself as he usually does: an uptight, neurotic, slightly nerdish slightly intellectual Jew who means well, but in truth is a putz! Well worth seeing if you enjoy chuckles and an occasional belly laughter, but no deep roars from this work, sadly.
| 7/10 | carlrfournier_2005@ - 8 reviews 30.8.2012 - age: 36-49 |
A really fun and entertaining movie, took my mind away completely to the other world of Rome, funny, great cast, terrific! Everyone was laughing and talking about it on the way out of the theatre! Great that Woody was in it as well.
| 9/10 | regreimer@ - first review 26.8.2012 - age: 50+ |
Beautifully shot. Ought to do wonders for Rome's tourism industry... Some good acting, although not great. Nice to see Mr Allen in his own movie, acting in how own usual and expected manner. Still, not enough to carry the entire film. No surprises here and clearly not one of Woody Allen's best.
| 5/10 | luclafortune@ - 11 reviews 23.8.2012 - age: 50+ |
Woody, what happened? I thought this film would've been so much better. Really. I've seen this all before, but in a different location. Woody, I am not going to give up on you now. Please, just go through the script carefully with a few others. Write a story that is worth shooting in a foreign country. Add some drama if your comedic side isn't with it. Not your best.
| 5/10 | james_leroy@ - 15 reviews 22.8.2012 - age: 36-49 |
I've seen better but still a big fan of Woody Allen.
| 7/10 | steevenlaing@ - first review 20.8.2012 - age: 18-25 |
This movie was very funny, I thought it had a very good story to it, Penelope Cruz her italian was very sharp, I had a lot of fun, I will give this movie a 7 out of 10. Thank you.
| 7/10 | gelsomina77@ - first review 20.8.2012 - age: 50+ |
I am an unconditional Woody Allen fan, but this was not very good movie. Entertaining although with a lot of mediocrity compared to what a W. Allen movie used to be.
| 6/10 | nabican74@ - 30 reviews 18.8.2012 - age: 36-49 |
J'ai ri et Woody Allen est drôle comme lui seul peut l'être... mais ce n'est pas son meilleur à mon avis. Les images de Rome sont époustouflantes.
| 7/10 | michlll29@ - 2 reviews 18.8.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Beautiful scenes; beautiful music; funny episodes; well written; a real comedy of errors in the classical style. Saw it already twice - may see it again. [...]
| 10/10 | dbjutasi@ - first review 17.8.2012 - age: 50+ |
Very intelligent humor, yet natural. Clear understanding of life, yet optimist and funny. And beautiful music... and Rome, of course!
| 10/10 | filomena.sss@ - 2 reviews 14.8.2012 - age: 50+ |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Woody should NOT act any more! "I have fallen in love with Rome" was repeated again and again - cheap. Poor story line...
| 3/10 | howardtaco1999@ - 69 reviews 14.8.2012 - age: 36-49 |
This may be a much poorer movie than MIDNIGHT IN PARIS, but it is still a solid and entertaining film. There's the neuroticism and a bit too much of CURB YOUR ENTHUSIASM in these scenes sometimes, but they are funny. The entertainment here is not the plot, it is the tribute to the great city of Rome, old and new, then and now. The Americans in this film look like outsiders, and every time they change from Italian to English, it seems like the movie loses some lustre. There is some opportune, if not very good, acting. There are no miscasts really. Case in point is Alec Baldwin, who is there to move the plot along. Allen casts himself beautifully. There are some underlying subplots in the film that bring it together yet keep each story distinct. Everything that is there is necessary. So why only a 7? For one, it is too lighthearted and by the end we don't take it seriously. For two, it is weaker when compared to other Woody Allen films. Also, there are some gaps that could have been better filled and Allen didn't take the opportunity to go past the ho-hum. We are left with something at the same level as an HBO mini-series comedy. But then again, HBO is only TV. On the other hand, THE SOPRANOS is better than almost any film. Finally, it is a good idea to go see this movie just to get a lift rather than expect a cinematographic masterpiece.
| 7/10 | tedkouretas@ - 52 reviews 13.8.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Brilliant! As is Woody!!! He brings to the screen only what the mere mortal thinks... yet, does the mere mortal even think what he brings to the screen. KUDOS!!! AGAIN, WOODY!!
| 10/10 | bubaloo@ - 9 reviews 13.8.2012 - age: 50+ |
Woody Allen tries to capitalize on his recent success, "Midnight in Paris", by picking a story that has as its underlying theme another great city, Rome. He fails miserably. I was expecting clever, witty and amusing, and instead I got tired, disjointed and overdone. His own character -- he has a part in the movie -- is a tired rehash of all the other neurotic wimpy characters he's portrayed in previous movies (think "Love and Death", "Broadway Danny Rose", "Sleeper", "Bananas") The other actors -- Eisenberg, Baldwin and Benigni in particular -- put in credible performances, but this isn't enough to get the movie's disjointed plot off the ground. Don't go. Consider renting only if you're a huge Allen fan.
| 3/10 | cjuneau@ - 39 reviews 13.8.2012 - age: 50+ |
This movie was great! I really enjoyed the site scenes in Rome as well as a great humor. I definitely recommend watching it for fun.
| 8/10 | nverlan@ - first review 11.8.2012 - age: 26-35 |
It seems that Woody Allen has run out of ideas. It is sad when people refuse to leave on a high note when they cannot come up with something better.
| 5/10 | msabaye@ - 14 reviews 9.8.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Typical Woody Allen film. But this one was very disappointing. Dialogue was old and tired as was the story line. Ellen Page was annoying. Alec Baldwin was wonderful. The scenes of Rome were the best thing about the film. Loved the cinematography.
| 5/10 | pink@ - 7 reviews 8.8.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Does Jesse Eisenberg represent a young Woody? He could! Jewish, neurotic, messed up. Compare it in your mind to his earlier flick Manhattan. Enjoyable movie, and the scenery is fabulous. It's so evocative of the place. Baldwin was like a Greek chorus. Everyone's possibilities in life. So, Midnight in Paris played with time, and so does this... what next? All Woody's movies make you think... if nothing else...
| 8/10 | turnerbrenda@ - 7 reviews 6.8.2012 - age: 50+ |
A feel good Woody Allen movie. You will enjoy it especially of you've been to Rome before.
| 9/10 | amboue@ - first review 6.8.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Very entertaining movie, I really enjoy the way Mr. Allen portrays Rome in this movie.
| 7/10 | sentenza99@ - 599 reviews 3.8.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Woody Allen's respectful nod to all that makes fabulous Italy - from art, to architecture, history, music, cinema and love - all with his own personal twist and magic. A must see for Woody Allen fans.
| 8/10 | cyn.ramacieri@ - 42 reviews 31.7.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Fantastic film! Loved, loved, loved. Go see it now.
| 10/10 | anastasiajade@ - first review 31.7.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Add a ton of hearty laughs, many whimsical moments, interesting characters in a gorgeously filmed Rome and you have a pretty entertaining movie - a satirical farce. Many may say that the four segments are not connected, or for that matter that neither is the time sequence, however this did not bother me a bit. Each segment had its own flavour and punch and somehow they connected in their own way, as only Woody could pull off so well, in my opinion. I thoroughly enjoyed this film - very Woody - very funny.
| 8/10 | ponderingred@ - 35 reviews 31.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
Couldn't begin to tell you what this movie is about but it was entertaining. Have never been a big Woody Allen fan but he did provide several laugh out loud moments.
| 6/10 | mail@ - 14 reviews 31.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
I love the genius of Woody Allen. His movies are very entertaining and unique. Love the European themed movies of late Midnight in Paris last year and now this new one set in Rome... love the way Rome is depicted. The characters are stricly Allenseque and you have to understand his humour and the way he thinks... I do and love all his films comedy or drama - the man is a genius even at 76.
| 7/10 | katikjulia@ - first review 30.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
What was Alec Baldwin's character doing in this movie? His character was not needed whatsoever. The stories were somewhat disconnected. Not one of Allen's best works that's for sure.
| 6/10 | kira_9@ - 59 reviews 30.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Woody is a megalomaniac living in dreams of his past. This pathetic drivel is unfit to be called a “movie”. The actors who participated in this travesty should be embarrassed.
| 1/10 | eyevrtiltin@ - 2 reviews 29.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
A really pleasant Woody Allen movie, not as great as Midnight in Paris, but in intelligence, dialogue and originality, far above most American comedies. It was so good in location that we went and bought tickets to go to Rome within 3 days of seeing the film.
| 7/10 | shayden@ - first review 29.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
If u like dumb and wierd this is it. Save your money. Almost convinced the wife to leave but she's a Woody Allan fan. But she agrees this is just a dumb movie and you have to read most of it.
| 2/10 | ggriff1959@ - 35 reviews 27.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
Not good but OK. It is a strange film which I liked more than my wife did. Woody I think is a required taste and over the years he has some very good films, this is not one of them.
| 4/10 | michjulien@ - 159 reviews 27.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
I can't help it, I love Woddy Allens humor, always have and always will. Yah, Woody is his usual neurotic self but it's a smart kind of funny and he always manages to mirror a little neurosis in all of us and those we know. It's a fine cast and the actors are enjoyable to watch. What's there not to like, unless you'r bored with Woody Allen in which case you'll hate this movie. I saw the movie twice and enjoyed it the second time as much as the first.
| 9/10 | sangito@ - 4 reviews 26.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
It helps to be a fan of Woody Allen. Not his best but definitely not his worst. Rome looks gorgeous and the characters are all fun. Good summer movie - light, frothy and amusing.
| 6/10 | sptaylor@ - 9 reviews 26.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
I LOVE Woody Allen films. Always inspiring and artsy!
| 10/10 | johanna@ - 5 reviews 26.7.2012 - age: 18-25 |
Idiotic story lines, not one bit funny... movie is made for brain dead simpletons.
| 1/10 | tekkmeister@ - 2 reviews 25.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.
Click to see more reviews:
[1-50]
[51-80]
Did you see ''To Rome with Love''?
Terms and Privacy Policy under which this service is provided to you.
© 1996-2013 CinemaClock Canada Inc.
